AQAST Projects

View the AQAST glossary of common terms and acronyms defined.

The NASA AQAST supported two types of projects:

All projects have a focus on short-term deliverables designed to best assist the needs of our air quality Scroll down this page for the list of all AQAST projects.

Final AQAST Investigator Projects

Quantifying background and anthropogenic contributions to U.S. air qualityPI: Arlene Fiore, Columbia/LDEOCo-I’s: Meiyun Lin, Princeton Other Personnel: Jean Guo, Xiaomeng Jin, George Milly, Luke Valin, Cynthia Zucker, Columbia/LDEO; Lee Murray, Columbia/LDEO and NASA GISS AQ Mgmt Partners: Joe Pinto, EPA/NCEA; Pat Dolwick, EPA/OAR; Terry Keating, EPA/OAR/OPAR; Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8; Tom Moore, WESTAR; Kurt Kebschull CT DEEP; Paul Miller, NESCAUM; Mark Estes, TCEQ Outcomes: (1) Estimates of the balance between domestic versus international emission controls needed to attain the ozone and PM NAAQS. (2) Enhanced knowledge needed to develop criteria to define exceptional events. (3) Knowledge of conditions under which daily satellite products, including from future satellite instruments, might provide insights into transport pathways, effective control strategies, and/or the regional chemical regime.

A Public Research Testbed for Assimilating Remote Sensing Products in Operational Air Quality ForecastingPI: Greg Carmichael (U. Iowa)Co-I’s: Scott Spak, (U. Iowa). AQ Mgmt Partners: Joe Hoch (Wisc DNR); Mike Koerber (LADCO); Matthew Johnson (Iowa DNR). Outcomes: (1) Operational state-of-the-science regional fine particle forecast for a region with urban 24- hour NAAQS exceedances throughout the year and no current forecast system; (2) AQ managers from 10-15 states accustomed to using model guidance in forecasting and action-days decisions for PM2.5; (3) Assessment of the impacts of satellite land cover, meteorology, and atmospheric composition products on model performance for regulatory standards; (4) Establishment of a public testbed and benchmark performance archive; (5) Evaluation of region-specific emission scenarios reduce winter PM2.5 in the Midwest; (6) Guidelines, needs assessment and implemented examples of a rapidly deployable urban- scale exposure nowcasting system for air pollution events.

Inverse modeling of NOx emissions over Texas using OMI NO2 dataPI: Daniel Cohan (Rice U.); Co-I’s: Wei Tang and Ben Lash (Rice U.); AQ Mgmt Partners: Mark Estes (TCEQ), Jim MacKay (TCEQ), Lok Lamsal (NASA), Jesse Bash (US EPA); Outcomes:Better understanding of the strengths and limitations of using OMI-based inverse modeling of NO2 to adjust emissions inventories used in regulatory attainment modeling.

Analysis and Modeling with OMI, MODIS, and DISCOVER-AQ dataPI: Russell Dickerson (U. Maryland)Co-I’s: T. Canty, D. Anderson, R. Salawitch, & K. Vinnikov (UMD); N. Krotkov & Ken Pickering (NASA/GSFC); AQ Mgmt Partners: Tad Aburn (MDE); John Sherwell (MDNR); Outcomes: (1) Improvements in CAMx, CB05 and CMAQ for the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Weight of Evidence (WoE) for Maryland and surrounding States; (2) Estimates of interstate transport of ozone and precursors; (3) Improved estimates of emissions from American (east coast) cities.

Develop an Air Quality User’s Guide: Satellite Data for Air Quality Monitoring: Examples of Applications, Answers to FAQs, and Common Mistakes to AvoidPI: Bryan Duncan (NASA/GSFC)Co-I’s: Yasuko Yoshida (SSAI and NASA/GSFC), numerous AQAST members; AQ mgmt partners: Jennifer Hains and other employees of the Maryland Dept. of the Environment; Outcomes:Facilitate the use of satellite data by the AQ community by demystifying the data and showing the utility of the data for AQ applications.

Addressing Western U.S. AQ Issues through Modeling, Satellites and Field Experiments; PI: David Edwards (NCAR)Co-I: Gabriele Pfister (NCAR); AQ Mgmt Partners: Gordon Pierce (CDPHE), Patrick Reddy (CDPHE), Gail Tonnessen (EPA Region 8); Outcomes: (1) Improved understanding and characterization of Front Range Summertime Ozone; (2) Collaboration and exchange of tools and information with local and regional AQ managers.

Processes influencing the daily-to-decadal variability of U.S. background ozone levels; PI: Arlene Fiore (Columbia/LDEO)Co-I’s: Meiyun Lin (Princeton), Mae Gustin and Rebekka Fine (both University of Nevada, Reno); AQ Mgmt Partners: Joe Pinto (EPA/NCEA), Pat Dolwick, (EPA/OAR) Terry Keating (EPA/OAR/OPAR), Gail Tonnesen (EPA Region 8), Adele Malone and Rob Bamford (both Nevada Division of Environmental Protection); Outcomes: (1) Better estimates of the balance between domestic versus international emission controls needed to attain ever-tightening standards on daily to decadal time scales; (2) Enhanced knowledge needed to develop criteria to define exceptional events; (3) Determine potential for space-based products to indicate background enhancements to surface O3 over the Western United States with a few days lead time.

Oversampling OMI SO2 to identify locations and long-term trends in large point sources in the Midwest; PI’s: Jack Fishman and Benjamin De Foy (Saint Louis University)AQ Mgmt Partners: Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO); Outcomes:Publication on SO2 sources and lifetime.

Ozone Garden Project and Coordination of Outreach Activities for AQASTPI’s: Jack Fishman and Benjamin De Foy (Saint Louis University)Education/Outreach Partners: Dr. Cindy Encarnacion, (Saint Louis Science Center), Sheila Voss, (Missouri Botanical Garden); Outcomes: A comprehensive plan that can be used as foundation to coordinate education/outreach activities among the members of AQAST; Outcomes: (1) Maintain garden and collect data quantifying follar injury to plants; (2) Analyze follar injury and ozone data.

Integration of climate impacts into design of ozone and aerosol control strategiesPI: Daven Henze (CU Boulder)Co-I’s: Jana Milford (CU Boulder), Drew Shindell (GISS), Kevin Bowman (JPL), Rob Pinder (EPA); AQ Mgmt Partners: Erika Sasser (EPA/OAQPS), Susan Anenberg (EPA/OAQPS); Outcomes: (1) Quantify the per-country radiative forcing from black carbon to inform EPA involvement in North American strategy for black carbon reduction; (2) Allow OAQPS to assess the radiative forcing impacts of emissions scenarios designed for achieving PM NAAQS as part of their Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA); (3) Provide source relationships for human health, climate and ecosystem damage to the Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC) National Action Planning Toolkit.

Atmospheric processes affecting emission sector contributions to O3 and PM2.5 episodesPI: Tracey Holloway (U. Wisconsin-Madison)Co-I’s: Erica Scotty, Alexandra Karambelas, and Steve Ackerman (all U. of WisconsinMadison); AQ Mgmt Partners: Bart Sponseller and Joseph Hoch, (Wisc. DNR); Terry Keating (U.S. EPA); Rob Kaleel (LADCO); Outcomes: (1) Improved SIP planning for LADCO states on ozone and particulate matter; (2) Development of methods and data sources to support satellite analysis with CMAQ

Aerosol data products for assimilation into air quality modelsPI: Edward Hyer (NRL)Co-I’s: Jianglong Zhang (UND); AQ Mgmt Partners: NOAA; NOAA/NWS/NCEP, currently seeking other connections; Outcomes: (1) Improved assimilation-grade AOD data available for regional modeling applications; (2) Assimilation grade AOD refinements designed to assist NOAA air quality modeling efforts.

Improved use of satellite fire observations for reanalysis of air quality eventsPI: Edward Hyer (NRL)Co-I’s: Jun Wang (U. Nebraska); AQ Mgmt Partners: Jeff McQueen (NOAA/NWS/NCEP), Ho-Chung Huang (NOAA/NWS/NCEP); Outcomes: (1) Improved daily time series of fire activity for air quality studies; (2) Improved description of diurnal variation in fires for numerical modeling of smoke.

Background ozone in the contiguous US and use of formaldehyde observations from space to better understand the factors controlling biogenic VOC emissionsPI: Daniel Jacob (Harvard); Other Personnel: Katie Travis and Lei Zhu (Harvard); AQ Mgmt Partners: EPA/NCEA; EPA/ORD; Outcomes: (1) Improved background ozone estimates to support future revision of the ozone NAAQS; (2) Better understanding of the variability of biogenic VOC emissions on interannual and longer time scales, and of the ability of satellite HCHO observations to constrain this variability.

Evaluation of satellite-based wild and prescribed fires products in southeastern USPI: Yang Liu (Emory U.)AQ Mgmt Partners: Di Tian (GAEPD); Outcomes: (1) Improved biomass burning emission inventory in this region; (2) Improved accuracy of CMAQ simulations in the Southeast.

Estimating the climate penalty for U.S. ozone air quality: Rapid calculation across models and scenariosPI: Loretta J. Mickley (Harvard)AQ Mgmt Partners: Susan C. Anenberg and Carey Jang (EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards); Outcomes: The tool that we propose to develop will allow AQ managers to readily calculate the climate change penalty for regional ozone air quality.

Improving the modeling of the physical atmosphere for SIPs and air quality forecastingPI: Richard McNider (U. Alabama in Huntsville)Co-I’s: Arastoo Biazar, (U. Alabama in Huntsville); AQ Mgmt Partners: Bright Dornblauser (TCEQ), Jon Pleim (EPA/NERL); Outcomes: (1) Improved physical modeling in future ozone SIP plans; (2) Improved confidence in selected control strategies.

Predicting air quality under fire impacts using an operational air quality forecasting systemPI: Ted Russell (Georgia Tech)Co-I’s: Yongtao Hu (Georgia Tech), M. Talat Odman (Georgia Tech); AQ Mgmt Partners: Jim Boylan (GAEPD) Susan Zimmer-Dauphinee (GAEPD), Alan Dozier (GFC); Outcomes: Operational ozone and PM2.5 forecasting products with enhancements that can provide guidance on local agencies’ efforts to provide accurate public warnings ahead of ozone and PM episodes.

Derivation of point-source emission estimates from satellite retrievalsPI: David Streets (ANL)Other Personnel: Zifeng Lu (ANL), Ben de Foy, (Saint Louis U); Nick Krotkov (NASA/GSFC); AQ Mgmt Partners: Marc Houyoux, Carey Jang, Jeremy Schreifels (all U.S. EPA); Outcomes: The results will have benefits for AQ managers to cross-check power plant emissions (or their operation) from spaceborne observations. If additional emission regulations were to be implemented in the future, AQ managers would also be able to monitor the actual operation of emission control devices. Both domestic and international EPA activities will benefit.

Statistical Air Quality Forecast Support during DISCOVER-AQPI: Anne Thompson (Penn State)Co-I’s: Gregory Garner, Penn State; AQ Mgmt Partners: Laura Landry (MDE); Outcomes: We will bring newly developed statistical models derived specifically for predicting air quality at sites within the DISCOVER-AQ region of interest These forecasts will be provided on a daily basis to the AQ contact listed above as a supplemental tool in forecasting ozone alert days and help with decisions regarding flying the research aircraft during DISCOVER-AQ.

AQAST Year 4 Tiger Team Projects

Please see our AQAST Tiger Team Year 4 Projects page for a complete list of ongoing Tiger Team projects.